Andrew Huberman· PhD
But the idea is to be aware of it, right? And if one's needs, aren't being met to acknowledge that, right? 'Cause people can get into a rhythm of therapy where it's really not helping them, right?
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
But the idea is to be aware of it, right? And if one's needs, aren't being met to acknowledge that, right? 'Cause people can get into a rhythm of therapy where it's really not helping them, right?
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
But I think the person also needs to, take ownership, right? Of their own therapy and say, if I don't feel helped enough, well, I have to think about that, right? And talk to the therapist about that, 'cause it, maybe that therapist isn't a match, right? Or maybe you talk to the therapist and the therapist can change his or her approach, right? Or maybe you talk to the therapist and increase the frequency, right?
But I think the person also needs to, you know, take ownership, right, of their own therapy and if I don't feel helped enough, well, I have to think about that, right? And and talk to the therapist about that because maybe maybe that therapist isn't a match.