The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
there has been in Psychology a debate really vicious debate actually for probably 50 years about the nature of facial expressions and whether they are Universal and whether there's this onetoone correspondence between a particular face and like a facial configuration in a particular emotional state smiling in happiness scowling in Anger wrinkling your nose and discussed
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.