The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
the distribution of kind of like uh people who have this by the way folks there aren't single brain areas for whole emotions but let's just for sake of Simplicity here that have the guilt area activated even when they didn't take the money yes the entire population of subjects doesn't experience that to the same degree you have these people who for whom it's very high amplitude response and others who aren't
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.