Andrew Huberman· PhD
Cuz I think once you start thinking about it too much, you're just more prone to not just make errors, but just like get too get caught up in your own mind.
We can't find evidence that holds up here. Proponents are reasoning from mechanism or analogy rather than direct human data, and the most credible skeptics raise objections we can't dismiss.
Cuz I think once you start thinking about it too much, you're just more prone to not just make errors, but just like get too get caught up in your own mind.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.