We can't find evidence that holds up here. Proponents are reasoning from mechanism or analogy rather than direct human data, and the most credible skeptics raise objections we can't dismiss.
As I say this, I'm realizing that the wish for or the impulse to really just suppress intrusive thought born of trauma or whatever else is really futile. That's not going to work. It's not going to work. We have to embrace these narratives and not expect them to disappear in a finger snap, but embrace them and see them and look at them and be unafraid to look at them and discount where they are. Absolutely not true.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.