The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
people predict social interactions just not going to be that fun um it's not going to be worth it right this seems to be a spot where our predictions about how good something's going to be don't necessarily match how good it ultimately will going to be
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
all these domains where we can kind of connect with another person we sort of was like yeah it may be net good if I was rating it on some scale but it winds up being way better than we predict in all these contexts
all these spots are ones where our predictions are off it's not the veilance that's off we know it'll be good but we just don't realize how good