Andrew Huberman· PhD
However, if we are chronically socially isolated, meaning we don't have interactions with people for a long time, we become actually more introverted.
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
However, if we are chronically socially isolated, meaning we don't have interactions with people for a long time, we become actually more introverted.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
but it's well-established now that in humans and in animals, if you don't give them enough social interaction, they actually become antisocial.
However, if we are chronically socially isolated, meaning we don't have interactions with people for a long time, we become actually more introverted. It's well established now that in humans and in animals, if you don't give them enough social interaction, they actually become antisocial. This social homeostasis circuit works in a way such that when we don't have social interactions for a very long time, we start to lose our craving for social interactions.