The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
I teach a psychology of death, and loss class at the University of Arizona, and my students will say to me, "You are way too happy to be teaching this class." And I say to them, "That's not a mistake. That's not incidental. It is because every single day, I'm thinking about death and dying. I'm thinking about grief and loss."
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.