The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
I for instance can recall taking my so-called qualifying exams in graduate school where they ask you questions until you say I don't know until you don't know the answer it's just like that puzzle in the bow Meister study they're taking you to the point where you basically can't win and that turns out to be a very important lesson that extends beyond the information that they're asking you about
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.