The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
And so the first uh monkey uh gets a piece of cucumber and he's happy. He eats that cucumber and then the the researcher turns towards the second um monkey and requests the same behavior, gets the same behavior and feeds that animal a grape and capuchins uh are not too enthusiastic about cucumbers, but they really love grapes. So when she then turns back to the first monkey again and and repeats the behavior and again
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.