The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
I personally have been using a gratitude protocol for the last several years. But that protocol was based on my ignorance, really, about the scientific literature, and was mainly based on what I'd heard out there in the internet, which is that I should list out or think about, or verbally recite the things that I'm grateful for. The sort of protocol that we arrived at today based on the scientific literature is distinctly different from that.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.