The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
the cool thing is that now that you have a biomarker you can hack that right in the sense that now we can start looking at all those trust building exercises or anything else that you know was supposed to turn things up turn up the dial on teamwork or communication and we have a readout we could say yeah that's working that's actually doing the thing it's not BS right you should invest your time and energy in that rather than something else
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.