The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
i think covet actually threw us into this new world that we weren't expecting um because we had to start treating people who were suicidal virtually for example and we were able to realize that this idea that we had to see people in person was a myth that we believed
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
there doesn't seem to be any uh as far as we know so far any added risk of seeing somebody through telehealth when they're suicidal