The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
if you have an urge for a reward that that's a normal phenomenon that's not something we're trying to stop the issue is if you have an urge for a reward that either puts you or somebody else at risk it's probably a reward we shouldn't have
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
If you have an urge for a reward, that that's a normal phenomenon. That that's not something we're trying to stop. The the issue is if you have an urge for a reward that either puts you or somebody else at risk, it's probably a reward we shouldn't have.