The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
To me, that's a really important piece and something that we don't do enough in our current culture. Especially in psychiatry, frankly, where there's like a lot of eternally empathizing with patients, but not a whole lot of likes going well, you know, actually you kind of messed that up. Or like that was really bad on you, you know.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.