The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
So I had a very lovely patient who was, had a severe alcohol addiction, and she got into recovery from her alcohol addiction for many years. But she kind of had a sort of a polydipsia, or an urge to be drinking something a lot. And so she drank a lot of water and slowly, over time, she realized that if she drank enough water, she could become hyponatremic and delirious and be out of herself.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.