Andrew Huberman· PhD
So we think about defense mechanisms. They can be clear, they can let light through in this beautiful way that has fidelity, or they can be very distorting.
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
So we think about defense mechanisms. They can be clear, they can let light through in this beautiful way that has fidelity, or they can be very distorting.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.