The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
I also am aware that there are some very high-profile papers that been published in the last really 5 years or so pointing to potential increased risk for psychosis of lasting duration — even after the effects of cannabis have worn off in high THC cannabis users in particular high THC cannabis users that initiate that cannabis use young and this might be preferentially impacting males
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
they seek out um using cannabis if someone is prone to develop it may initiate or trigger the onset of the disease um and I think in the long term it will likely make the prognosis of the disease worse