The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
I learned this tool called just play the tape out, right? So you go, if you're an idiot, you're an idiot. But if you're have any level of intelligence, you go, "Well, how do you think this ends for you? How do you think this drug problem ends for you? How do you think cheating on your wife ends for you? How do you think non-stop g like it doesn't end well?"
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
So I yeah that that playing the tape out is a very valuable powerful like I I need to take action in this way
I learned this tool called just play the tape out, right? So you go, if you're an idiot, you're an idiot. But if you have any level of intelligence, you go, "Well, how do you think this ends for you? How do you think this drug problem ends for you? How do you think cheating on your wife ends for you? How do you think non-stop gam like it doesn't end well?"
Literally in addiction psychiatry, we we have a cool technique that we use with people where it doesn't really work so much anymore, but we tell people to play the tape through to the end.