The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
the history of psychotherapy trials is largely based on a paradigm known as randomized clinical trials where you would recruit individuals who meet a certain inclusion criteria say somebody meets the diagnosis for depression and then you would randomize them to either say receive you know 12 weeks of cognitive behavioral therapy or receive nothing or receive a treatment as usual or standard of care and then evaluate outcomes over time
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.