The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
So it turns out that when goals were moderate, when they were just outside of one's immediate abilities or that one felt that yeah, that would take a lot of effort but it's within range or maybe in range like maybe I can do it, maybe I can't, then there was a near doubling of the likelihood that they would engage in the ongoing pursuit of that particular goal.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.