Peter Attia· MD
if the patient is able to abstain for four weeks they come back we ask them how how it went um and we kind of make a pros and cons list what was good about not using what was what was bad about not using in those four weeks
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
if the patient is able to abstain for four weeks they come back we ask them how how it went um and we kind of make a pros and cons list what was good about not using what was what was bad about not using in those four weeks
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.