Andrew Huberman· PhD
And his general observation was that there was something in the urine that was indeed making the guinea pigs more manic if they were injected with urine from a manic patient.
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
And his general observation was that there was something in the urine that was indeed making the guinea pigs more manic if they were injected with urine from a manic patient.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
So what he figured out was that the urine from manic patients seemed to be more toxic for these guinea pigs.