Andrew Huberman· PhD
So, we want to utilize those things, but we don't want to become dependent on them. So, shape your environment for your benefit, but also be stable enough internally to where you don't need your Aquaria to feel stable
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
So, we want to utilize those things, but we don't want to become dependent on them. So, shape your environment for your benefit, but also be stable enough internally to where you don't need your Aquaria to feel stable
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.