Andrew Huberman· PhD
But the important points that came from the data, and, again, this is a very large data set, was that, and here again, I'm paraphrasing, first, people's minds wandered frequently regardless of what they were doing.
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
But the important points that came from the data, and, again, this is a very large data set, was that, and here again, I'm paraphrasing, first, people's minds wandered frequently regardless of what they were doing.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.