The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
Now, that sounds almost like a news article or a news article about a scientific paper, but that's actually the title of the scientific paper which was published in the journal, "Science," which is one of the three apex journals.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
my memory of this wonderful paper I think was published in science I think I think the title was a Wandering mind is an unhappy mind and um basically the Takeover from the article was that people spend between well if you look at this paper and lots of others like it what what we can deduce is that people spend between 1/ half and onethird of their waking hours not focused on the present so between 1 half and one/ third of the time we're drifting away and we're thinking about other things and this one particular paper link that process with thinking about things that cause you to feel worse