The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
you should be able to distinguish in fact I encourage you to spend a little bit of time maybe even just five or 10 minutes thinking about you know who are the individuals and groups that I interact with that leave me feeling taxed you know that really seem to drain my energy and have me ruminating and in a not good space when I leave whatever interaction I had with them
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.