The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
Like why not choose something you're really good at. Because then the message is not communicated as clearly. And a lot of this is unconscious. Let's choose something I'm kind of fair to middling at, right? And then make it very clear that no one gets to be better or I
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
Let's choose something I'm kind of fair to middling at, right? And then make it very clear that no one gets to be better or I do something destructive to them.