Andrew Huberman· PhD
The dispute over whether cannabis can cause psychosis is a waste of time. It obviously can in some individuals with a predisposition. It’s just hard to know who that will be.
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
The dispute over whether cannabis can cause psychosis is a waste of time. It obviously can in some individuals with a predisposition. It’s just hard to know who that will be.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
But if we do not acknowledge the negative health effects that are documented in the literature, then we are overlooking some very important data, especially as it relates to the development of psychosis in certain individuals.
but there's certainly a a possibility there would you say that if somebody is a regular high THC cannabis user that they are at greater risk to developing Psych is if they're taking