The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
Now is chemistry absolutely required for forming stable attachments for love and for desire? No, of course, they're not. But in general, these are primitive mechanisms that exist in all animals, they exist in special forms in humans, but that they drive us toward behaviors that will, as the theory goes, lead to love and attachment.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.