Peter Attia· MD
on the opposite end of the spectrum are people who have no challenge in their life and no traumas they have equally poor rates of mental health so it's kind of a u-shaped curve where having enough challenge in your life that
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
on the opposite end of the spectrum are people who have no challenge in their life and no traumas they have equally poor rates of mental health so it's kind of a u-shaped curve where having enough challenge in your life that
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
so it's kind of a u-shaped curve where having enough challenge in your life that you learn that you're what you're capable of that you can persist through things that you've got this seems to be healthy for people
and when you look at research on challenges in people's lives the people who have the worst rates of mental health are the people who have had a ton of challenges like an overwhelming amount of challenges and traumas but on the opposite end of the spectrum are people who have no challenge in their life and no traumas they have equally poor rates of mental health so it's kind of a U-shaped curve where having enough challenge in your life that you learn that you're what you're capable of that you can persist through things that you've got this seems to be healthy for people