The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
does it even make biological sense that engaging with social media could change the brain and in ways that are potentially harmful and and beneficial sure I mean it's you know that's the organ that we're using to consume social media um so it's completely biologically plausible
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
does it even make biologic IAL sense that engaging with social media could change the brain and in ways that are potentially harmful and beneficial sure