Andrew Huberman· PhD
For example, being low in a hierarchy is generally bad for health in like every mammal out there, including us, but we do something special, which is we can be part of multiple hierarchies at the same time.
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
For example, being low in a hierarchy is generally bad for health in like every mammal out there, including us, but we do something special, which is we can be part of multiple hierarchies at the same time.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
But we do something special which is we can be part of multiple hierarchies at the same time and while you may be low ranking in one of them, you could be extremely high ranking in another.