The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
instead what I started doing was give them what I call the save the world speech which is like look we're g to write this paper and it's going to be the kind of paper that no one would have done because it's so tedious but if it's trustworthy thousands of people would know how to have more accurate measurement and they're going to be so grateful for that
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.