Andrew Huberman· PhD
We want to be able to tolerate that distress enough to make choice and respond rather than react to whatever it is.
Loading…
The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
We want to be able to tolerate that distress enough to make choice and respond rather than react to whatever it is.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
the first thing is to stop well how do we stop it's by building these these abilities to have this distress tolerance even if it's for a few seconds and take a moment to be able to get present And look, and what I mean by that is get look look at what's actually happening.
practicing or understanding what your practice looks like to expand your distress tolerance window.