The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
apparently the falling asleep thing is actually that's a real deal. And there's there's people who like have really challenging problems like physicists and scientists and mathematicians and things like Yeah. And basically that the idea is like you force yourself to get to that point of falling asleep in order to trigger that that thought process.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.