The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
does it or could it you know could a well trained technician do this yeah well I mean I I think technically it's a DSM diagnos is right so it's usually somebody who has a clinical degree so it would be a clinical psychologist it could be a behavioral pediatrician it could be you know a child psychiatrist or child
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.