Andrew Huberman· PhD
if you look at devices people are wearing to detect their stress that might say high or low arousal but it can't distinguish between super good positive challenge type stress and really negative threat type stress
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
if you look at devices people are wearing to detect their stress that might say high or low arousal but it can't distinguish between super good positive challenge type stress and really negative threat type stress
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.