The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
the first step would be to describe the situation without adding on any interpretations or judgments so if i were your daughter you would say to me um olivia i understand that you want to now get a third earring great so often this means exactly what you did which is to keep it short because sometimes we have a tendency to go on and on and on about all of our reasons for something but actually the more we do that the more we lose the other person's interest
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
and then express would be to express your feelings about it i have some fear about you getting a third earring because i worry that it would damage your ears and this would be something that would bother you many years from now right so you know we could work on on simplifying or shortening or saying i i fear i have fears that you would regret this if you did it whatever it might be to get the express but that was also really nice because you didn't add on judgments you didn't say you shouldn't do this right these are all just describe the facts and then express your feelings about it