Andrew Huberman· PhD
And I wouldn't want people to think that those heat maps were generated by any physiological measurement, because they were not.
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
And I wouldn't want people to think that those heat maps were generated by any physiological measurement, because they were not.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
I think this book is truly important for the general population to read and understand, and neuroscientists should read and understand the contents, because we, as a culture, are way off in terms of how we think about emotions and states and behaviors.