Andrew Huberman· PhD
What hasn’t changed is that there are real risks for people with predisposition for psychosis, and when clinical work or recreational use doesn’t have the appropriate guardrails.
Loading…
We can't find evidence that holds up here. Proponents are reasoning from mechanism or analogy rather than direct human data, and the most credible skeptics raise objections we can't dismiss.
What hasn’t changed is that there are real risks for people with predisposition for psychosis, and when clinical work or recreational use doesn’t have the appropriate guardrails.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
with the caveat that this is not a call for people to just start taking them that you know these are powerful compounds that um people with psychosis or bipolar conditions in their family really really need to be careful and and on and on just be careful