Andrew Huberman· PhD
so perhaps if it can be controlled it's an asset and uh but if it goes awry and is uncontrollable then it becomes obsessive-compulsive disorder
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
so perhaps if it can be controlled it's an asset and uh but if it goes awry and is uncontrollable then it becomes obsessive-compulsive disorder
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
So you know I I think that some aspect of OCD which we often joke about but we should you know consider seriously cuz people do suffer from this u some aspect of it helps us u there are you know famous u CEOs that probably have some level of OCD uh surgeons and scientists alike so u perhaps if it can be controlled it's an asset