The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
And the wisdom, I guess, you know, to distill it down, I mean it's many things. But in terms of, you know, dopamine, the wisdom is there are adaptive ways to get your dopamine. And there are less than adaptive ways. And in general, you could describe the adaptive ways as not too potent.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.