Andrew Huberman· PhD
most of us, all of us are, myself included, you all of us, we're unreliable narrators because we're only telling the story through our own lens.
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
most of us, all of us are, myself included, you all of us, we're unreliable narrators because we're only telling the story through our own lens.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
most of us, all of us, we're unreliable narrators because we're only telling the story through our own lens.
You know, we're all we're all storytellers. We all try to make sense of something and we all believe that our story is the absolute accurate version of the story.