The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
you know the components that make us who we are you know that as you put it the structure of the self you know everything from the unconscious mind conscious mind defense mechanisms character structure self and the functions of self
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
so the character structure is all of that the part under the water the part above the water the defensive structure so imagine like a nest around all of that and that's the character structure that we utilize to interface with the world
should we ask ourselves what sorts of defenses we have and maybe this would be a good opportunity to um address this issue of what are healthy versus unhealthy defenses um because it sounds to me if I understand correctly that the defense mechanisms are a very strong component in determining what our character structure is right because the defense mechanisms are unconscious right the character structure that Nest around the defenses and the conscious mind through which we interface with the world right
Defense mechanisms are unconscious, so there's an automaticity to the response that the person can see by reflection. Because this isn't conscious choice to act out.