The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
The limbic system, right? The emotion system so to speak inside of us always Trump's logic, right? If you think about, does it ever make sense to run into a burning building? I mean, logic says no, right? But if someone you love is in the burning building, people run right in, right? Because the limbic system says, yes. So when logic and emotion come head to head, emotion wins all the time. If emotion is powerful enough, it will always win.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
The limbic system, right, the emotion system, so to speak, inside of us always trumps logic, right? If you think about does it ever make sense to run into a burning building? I mean, logic says no, right? But if someone you love is in the burning building, you people run right in, right? Because the lyic system says yes. So when logic and emotion come head-to-head, emotion wins all the time.