The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
assuming that their vision is reasonable I would just thread a needle threading the needle and then I'd ask them how they felt and everybody going to feel fine because you're actively engaged in doing something you're not engaged in what people call monkey brain or whatever worrying about tomorrow worrying about you know so on
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.