The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
I think if I'm not mistaken what you're describing is interactive dynamics that create or uh elaborate on circuitry that exists in all of us but that for some people might be atrophied because of the lack of proper nourishment emotional nourishment early in life but that we can engage these uh these circuits these right brain circuits
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.