Andrew Huberman· PhD
You ask a how or what question to make the other side think first and judge their reaction to how they think about it.
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
You ask a how or what question to make the other side think first and judge their reaction to how they think about it.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
Or they say, all right, if they stop and think about it and they give you a thoughtful answer, that's a completely different person on the other side.