Andrew Huberman· PhD
yes, it is true that sudden losses are harder for us to learn, to understand what's happened because we don't even have sort of a conscious You know, we've never run the scenario sort of through our mind.
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
yes, it is true that sudden losses are harder for us to learn, to understand what's happened because we don't even have sort of a conscious You know, we've never run the scenario sort of through our mind.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.